Provisions in play
The analysis names each article your facts touch, quotes its in-force text, and flags any provision that changed between the events and the filing.
Arabic-first legal analysis · pre-launch
Every provision, every amendment, every judgment — in one reading.
Legalyze is a workspace for lawyers, legal academics and law students. Upload a case file or open a statute and get a structured analysis — the provisions in play, their amendment history, related judgments and counter-arguments — with every claim linked back to the source text.
Uploaded case file · p. 4 · ¶ 12
وحيث إن المدعي أنهى خدمته بعد سبع سنوات متصلة، فإنه يستحق بدل إجازاته السنوية غير المستعملة عن السنوات الثلاث الأخيرة وفقاً للنص الساري وقت انتهاء الخدمة.
Highlighted passage — the claim under analysis
Structured analysis
- Provisions in play 3
- Amendment alerts 1 provision amended since the events
- Related judgments 4
- Counter-arguments 2
Needs attention
The leave-allowance claim relies on the pre-amendment text of Art. 74. The article was amended before the employment ended.
Art. 74 · in-force text Cassation 188/2019
One corpus, read together
- Statutes
- Amendments
- Official gazette
- Court judgments
- Case files
- Memoranda
The honest problem
The law is in force. The PDFs are not.
In Arabic-language jurisdictions, legal research is still an act of archaeology. The text that actually binds a client today is scattered across statute books, amendment laws, gazette scans and judgments that never met each other in one place.
Finding what a provision currently says — let alone how courts have applied it — can take days of reading. The reading is the billable hour nobody wanted to bill.
-
01
The current text of the law is nowhere
A statute lives in one PDF, its amendments in three others, and the consolidation in nobody's. What a provision says today is something each lawyer reconstructs by hand, every time.
-
02
Judgments are unsearchable in practice
Court decisions exist as scans and unindexed uploads. Whether a court has already applied the provision you are arguing is a question of who you know, not what you can search.
-
03
Generic chatbots answer without sources
A fluent paragraph with no citation is worse than no answer: it must be verified line by line against the very PDFs it was supposed to replace. An uncited claim saves a lawyer nothing.
-
04
Students learn the law out of context
Law faculties teach from provisions frozen at the year the textbook was printed. Students graduate never having seen a statute in force, in context, the way it will be argued.
What Legalyze does
A structured analysis, with the working shown.
Upload a case file or pick a statute. Legalyze returns the provisions in play, their amendment history, the judgments that applied them, and the counter-arguments the other side will reach for — and every one of those claims is a link back to the source text.
Judgments beside the text
Where a court has applied the provision, the judgment sits next to it — court, year, and the paragraph that matters, quoted rather than paraphrased.
Both sides of the argument
For every position, the counter-argument a competent opponent would raise — mapped to its own sources, so you rehearse the hearing before you enter it.
Nothing is asserted without a source
Every sentence Legalyze produces carries the provision or judgment it rests on. If the corpus cannot support a claim, the workspace says so instead of improvising — because an unverifiable answer is useless to a lawyer, and dangerous to a student.
The statute view
What the provision says today — and how it got there.
Open any article and read its consolidated, in-force text with the amendments applied — struck text struck, inserted text held in the highlight — beside the full history of how the provision changed and the judgments that applied it.
Consolidated text · amendments applied
قانون العمل
الباب السادس — الإجازات
المادة (٧٤)
يستحق العامل الذي أمضى في الخدمة سنة متصلة إجازة سنوية مدفوعة الأجر مدتها أربعة عشر يوم عمل واحد وعشرون يوم عمل، ولا يجوز الاتفاق على التنازل عنها.
ولا يجوز تأجيل الإجازة السنوية أو ترحيلها لأكثر من سنة واحدة إلا بموافقة العامل الخطية.
Amended Struck text superseded · inserted text in force since the 2021 amendment
Amendment history — Article 74
-
2000
Original text As enacted · superseded
-
2021
Amended — annual leave extended In force · applied in the view
-
2025
Draft amendment Not in force · tracked
Applied in judgments
- Cassation 188/2019Leave allowance on termination
- Appeal 412/2022Carry-over without written consent
In-force by default
You read the consolidated text first. The original and every intermediate version are one tap away, never in your way.
Amendments as diffs
Changes render the way lawyers already read them — struck and inserted — instead of as a footnote pointing at another PDF.
Judgments in the margin
Application, not just citation: each linked judgment shows the paragraph where the court actually used the provision.
Features
Built like a well-drafted memorandum.
Seven capabilities, one habit: every output is structured, sourced, and ready to stand behind in front of a judge or a class.
Statute & amendment tracking
Every statute consolidated into an in-force view, with each amendment dated, sourced to the gazette, and applied as a readable diff.
Case file analysis with cited sources
Upload the file, get the provisions in play and the claims that need attention — each one anchored to a page and paragraph of your own document.
Judgment search across courts and years
Search decisions by provision, court, year and subject — and land on the operative paragraph, not page one of a scan.
Argument & counter-argument mapping
Positions and their strongest replies laid out as a map, each node citing the provision or precedent it stands on.
Student mode with guided exercises
The same corpus, scaffolded: guided analysis exercises where students commit to a position first and see the sourced analysis after.
Arabic-first interface and corpus
Not a translation layer: the interface, the sources and the analysis are Arabic-first, with English available where your work needs it.
Export to formatted legal memoranda
When the analysis holds, it leaves the workspace as a properly structured memorandum — headings, quoted provisions, judgment citations and the counter-argument section — in a document your office can file, not a chat transcript to be reformatted at midnight.
Cited end to end
Who it's for
One corpus. Three ways of reading it.
The same statutes, judgments and analysis engine serve the person arguing tomorrow, the person teaching next semester, and the person sitting their first procedure exam.
Practice
Lawyers & small firms
The first read of a case file in minutes instead of days, with every claim already sourced — so the hours you bill are for judgement, not for locating PDFs.
- Case file analysis with citations
- In-force statute view and amendment alerts
- Memorandum export for filings
Professional tier · per seat, on request
Analyse a caseTeaching
Faculties & academics
Teach from the law in force, not the textbook's snapshot. Set analysis exercises on real provisions and see where a cohort's reasoning actually breaks.
- Course workspaces on the live corpus
- Guided exercises with model analyses
- Citation-checked coursework by design
Discounted academic licences for faculties
Bring it to your facultyStudy
Law students
Learn to argue, not to memorise. Student mode walks you through the analysis a practitioner would make — and shows the source behind every step.
- Guided analysis, step by step
- The same statutes lawyers use
- Practice cases with model answers
Free tier for law students during launch
Join the student waitlistAlso built with notaries, legal translators and other court-adjacent professionals in mind — tell us what you work with and we will show you where Legalyze fits.
How it works
From a file to an argument, in four steps.
No prompt engineering, no chat gymnastics. The workspace follows the shape legal analysis already has.
-
Open a statute or upload a case file
Pick a provision from the library, or drop in the PDF you were sent — judgment, contract, pleading, or the whole bundle.
-
Legalyze maps the provisions in play
The workspace names the articles your facts touch, pulls their in-force text, and flags anything amended since the events.
-
Read the analysis against its sources
Arguments, counter-arguments and the judgments behind them, side by side with the passages they rest on. Click any claim to land on its source.
-
Export the memorandum
What survives your reading leaves as a formatted memorandum with its citations intact — ready for the file, the client, or the classroom.
Where we actually are
A product about citations should cite its own numbers.
Legalyze is pre-launch, building its corpus with the people who will use it. The figures below stay blank until they are true — then they are published with dates and kept checkable.
- Statutes indexed
- —
- Judgments linked
- —
- Faculties teaching with it
- —
Counted only when a statute is consolidated, amendment-tracked and reviewed.
Counted per decision linked to the provisions it applies — not per scanned page.
Named with each faculty's permission, from the first semester onward.
What Legalyze is
A research and analysis workspace. It finds, structures and cites — and shows you exactly where every claim came from, so you can check it.
What it is not
It is not a lawyer and it does not give legal advice. The judgement, the strategy and the signature remain yours — Legalyze just makes sure they rest on the real text.
Why Arabic first
Because the corpus that needs this most is the one no major legal-research vendor serves. Arabic is the starting point of the product, not a locale added later.
Incubated at An-Najah National University · Innopark, Nablus. Built beside the university's law faculty — the corpus expertise, the first academic users, and the first classroom pilots are all on one campus.
Questions we get
Asked by lawyers, answered like one.
Is Legalyze giving legal advice?
No. Legalyze is a research and analysis workspace: it finds, structures and cites. What to argue, what to concede and what to sign remain professional judgements — yours. The product's job is to make sure those judgements rest on the text actually in force, with the sources one click away.
Where does the corpus come from?
From the published record: statutes and amendment laws as they appeared in the official gazette, and court judgments as published. Consolidation — applying each amendment to produce the in-force view — is done in the workspace and reviewed before a statute is counted as indexed. Every consolidated article keeps its trail back to the gazette text it came from.
What happens when the AI isn't sure?
It says so. A claim the corpus cannot support is shown as unsupported, not smoothed into a confident paragraph. That is the whole design position: an answer you cannot audit is not an answer a lawyer can use, so Legalyze would rather show you a gap than fill it with fluent guesswork.
Is my case file confidential?
Files you upload stay inside your workspace, are never added to the shared corpus, and are deletable on request. Before any firm uploads live material we agree confidentiality terms in writing and answer your questions about storage and access — ask us for the current terms on the contact page.
Does it work in English?
Yes, where your work needs it — the interface is bilingual and analyses can be produced in English. But the product is Arabic-first by design: the statutes, the judgments and the primary analysis live in the language the law was written in, because a translation of a provision is not the provision.
Which jurisdictions are covered?
We are starting with the Palestinian corpus — where the digitisation gap is deepest and where our first firms, faculty partners and students work — and expanding across Arabic-language jurisdictions from there. The coverage list will be published on this site as each corpus reaches the reviewed, in-force standard, and not before.
What does it cost?
Professional seats are subscription-priced and quoted on request while we are pre-launch; faculties get discounted academic licences; and law students get a free tier during launch. Whatever we quote you, we confirm in writing before anything is charged.
Early access
Read the law the way it will be argued.
We are onboarding the first firms, faculties and student cohorts now. Bring one live case or one course — we will walk it through the workspace with you, sources on screen.